Lopatchenko I.

PhD of Public administration, lecturer at the Training and Research and Production center, National university of civil defence of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Batyr Yu., PhD of Economic Sciences, associate professor, National university of civil defence of Ukraine, Kharkov. 

Batyr Yu.

PhD of Economic Sciences, associate professor, National university of civil
defence of Ukraine, Kharkov.

Krutii O.

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor of the Department of Political Science and Philosophy of KRI NAPA, the city of Kharkiv.

ACTUAL MECHANISMS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATE AND MANAGERIAL CULTURE IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

DOI: 10.52363/passa-2021.1-5

Abstract

The modern dimensions of corporate and managerial culture development in public administration in Ukraine has been justified. Corporate and managerial culture development is highlighted in particular different approaches. It is emphasized that the effectiveness of mechanisms in cultural modernization of public administration in Ukraine is a combination of objective (organizational-legal) and subjective (socio-psychological) components in development of corporate culture in public management. Objective components are analyzed, which provide for regulatory, structural, functional and methodological ordering the activities of state structures, taking into account the factors of corporate culture development. Subjective components have been shown to ensure the multidimensionality of communication tools. The basic characteristics of an innovative corporate culture such as knowledge, information, creativity and institutionalization are highlighted. It is proved that innovative corporate culture contributes to changing the status of professional activity of public servants, from managerial-controlling (power-influence), to consciously subordinate to the needs of citizens (power-interaction), and secondly to protect the culture of public administration from destructive influence global values and also the mobilization of public servants; and the public; consciousness towards engagement and mutual responsibility.

References

  1. Anishhenko, V. O. (2009). “Rol’ korporatyvnoi kul’tury v pryjnyatti upravlinskych rishen” [“The role of Corporate Culture in Managerial Decision-making”], journal Aktualni problemy ekonomiky [Current problems of the economy], vol. 3, 64–71. [Ukraine]
  2. Gaiduchenko S. O. (2016) Orhanizatsijna kul'tura u konteksti publichnoho upravlinnia [Organizational culture in the context of public administration], Monograph, Press Madrid, Kharkiv, 344 p. [Ukraine]
  3. Krutiy O. M. (2008) Dialohova vzayemodiya orhaniv derzhavnoyi vlady ta hromadsʹkosti [Dialogue interaction between public authorities and the public], Monograph, Press Magistr, Kharkiv, 236 p. [Ukraine]
  4. Spyvak, A. (2001). Korporatyvnaya kultura [Corporate Culture], Tutorial, Pyter, Sankt-Peterburg, 352 p.
  5. Shevchenko, V. S. (2011). “Vyznachennya vplyvu korporatyvnoyi kultury na diyalnist pidpryyemstva” [Determining of the impact of corporate culture on the enterprise], journal Komunalne gospodarstvo [Utilities], vol. 14, 160–165. [Ukraine]