Shvedun V.
Doctor of Science (Public Administration), Full Professor, Head of the Scientific Department on Problems of Management in the Civil Defence Sphere National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine, Kharkiv
Seidova-Bohoslovska E.
graduate student, National Aerospace University H.E. Zhukovsky «Kharkiv Aviation Institute»
Kovalchuk V.
Doctor of Science (Public Administration), Full Professor, Head of the Department of Economics and Public Administration, National Aerospace University H.E. Zhukovsky «Kharkiv Aviation Institute»
DOI: 10.52363/passa-2024.1-21
Abstract
The authors determine the positions of Ukraine in global digital economy indices on the basis of the local governments. The authors indicate the following subsystems of providing the digital economy infrastructure: technical (ICT capabilities in terms of individual sectors of the economy); information and technological (digital technologies); staffing (human capital); regulatory (institutional environment); financial and economic (investment opportunities of economic entities). The authors indicate a number of generally accepted parameters that allow to determine the level of digitalization within the economy and society: Internet coverage; the use of broadband Internet; the percentage of smartphone owners; mobile Internet coverage; the share of society with digital skills, public online services, etc. The authors propose to use the following main rating indices of digitalization: Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI); Digital Evolution Index (DEI); Digital Adoption Index (DAI); ICT Development Index (IDI); Global Innovation Index (GII); Networked Readiness Index (NRI); Digitization Index of the Economy (Boston Consulting Group ‒ e-Intensity); IMD World Digital Competitiveness Index (WDCI).
Key words: public administration, digital economy, global indices, digital economy infrastructure, local governments.
References
- Ataei Y., Mahmoudi A., Feylizadeh M., & Li D. (2020). “Ordinal priority approach (OPA) in multiple attribute decision-making”, Soft Comput. 86. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105893 (accessed: 30.01.2024).
- Li Q. & Zhao S. (2023). “The impact of digital economy development on industrial restructuring: evidence from China”,Sustainability 15. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410847 (accessed: 30.01.2024).
- Svahn F., Mathiassen L. & Lindgren R. (2017). “Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: how Volvo cars managed competing concerns”,Mis Q., 41, 239–253.
- Kohtamaki M., Parida V., Oghazi P., Gebauer H. & Baines T. (2019). „Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: a theory of the firm”, Bus. Res. 104, pp. 380–392.
- Wang Q. & Wei Y. (2023). “Research on the influence of digital economy on technological innovation: evidence from manufacturing enterprises in China”,Sustainability, 15. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064995 (accessed: 30.01.2024).
- Agung Purnomo, Triana Susanti, Elsa Rosyidah, Nuzula Firdausi & Mohammad Idhom (2022). “Digital economy research: thirty-five years insights of retrospective review”, Procedia Computer Science, 97, pp. 68-75.