Seidova-Bohoslovska E. MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT OF DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES

Seidova-Bohoslovska E.

graduate student, National Aerospace University H.E. Zhukovsky «Kharkiv Aviation Institute», Kharkiv
ORCID: 0000-0002-3334-5959

MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT OF DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES

DOI: 10.52363/passa-2025.1-20

Abstract

The conceptual principles of the formation of public administration in the field of civil protection in Ukraine from the perspective of ensuring its national security have been studied. It has been revealed that the concept of risk is becoming relevant today, this conclusion was made in view of the increasing number of challenges to national and civil security in Ukraine, which are transformed into dangers, posing a threat to the life and health of its population and the territories in which it lives. It is emphasized that the Concept of Risk Management of Emergencies of a Technogenic and Natural Nature was adopted in 2014, and it requires updating in view of the growing number of threats to the civil security of Ukraine. In addition, the structure of the public administration system in the field of civil protection has been studied, which allowed us to systematize the principles and tasks of public administration in this area. We recommend that they be included in the updated Concept of Risk Management of Emergencies of a Technogenic and Natural Nature, also focusing on military emergencies.

Keywords: public administration, public administration system, mechanisms, national security, civil security, civil protection, emergencies, authorities, concept.

References

  1. Agung Purnomo, Triana Susanti, Elsa Rosyidah, Nuzula Firdausi & Mohammad Idhom (2022). “Digital economy research: thirty-five years insights of retrospective review”, Procedia Computer Science, 97, pp. 6875.
  2. Branderhorst, E. M., & Ruijer, E. (2024). “Digital leadership in local government: an empirical study of Dutch city managers”, Local Government Studies, 1–24. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2024.2363368  (accessed: 27.09.2024).
  3. David ,A., Yigitcanlar, T., Li, R.Y.M., Corchado, J.M., Cheong, P.H., Mossberger, K., Mehmood, R. (2023). “Understanding Local Government Digital Technology Adoption Strategies: A PRISMA Review”, Sustainability, 15(12) (accessed: 27.09.2024).
  4. Falco, E. & Kleinhans, R. (2018). “Beyond technology: Identifying local government challenges for using digital platforms for citizen engagement”, International Journal of Information Management, 40, pp. 17-20.
  5. Kohtamaki M., Parida V., Oghazi P., Gebauer H. & Baines T. (2019). „Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: a theory of the firm”, J. Bus. Res. 104, pp. 380–392.
  6. Li Q. & Zhao S. (2023). “The impact of digital economy development on industrial restructuring: evidence from China”, Sustainability 15. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410847 (accessed: 30.01.2024).
  7. Svahn F., Mathiassen L. & Lindgren R. (2017). “Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: how Volvo cars managed competing concerns”, Mis Q., 41, pp. 239–253.
  8. Wang Q. & Wei Y. (2023). “Research on the influence of digital economy on technological innovation: evidence from manufacturing enterprises in China”, Sustainability, 15. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064995 (accessed: 30.01.2024).