Pomaza-Ponomarenko A., Taraduda D. DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOCIAL CONCEPT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF PROVIDING A SECURITY SYSTEM

Pomaza-Ponomarenko A.

Doctor in Public Administration, Senior Researcher of Science, Head of the research laboratory for studying management problems in the sphere of civil protection, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0001-5666-9350


Taraduda D.

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Management of Civil Defense Units, Institute of Postgraduate Education, Lviv State University of Life Safety
ORCID: 0000-0001-9167-0058

DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOCIAL CONCEPT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF PROVIDING A SECURITY SYSTEM

DOI: 10.52363/passa-2025.2-2

Abstract

A systematic analysis of the evolution of the social concept of public administration as a theoretical and practical paradigm of modern statehood has been carried out. It is shown that the social dimension of management forms the principles of justice, inclusiveness and orientation of state policy towards the person. The connection between the transformation of management paradigms and the social challenges of post-industrial society is revealed. A heat map of the development of social elements of public administration is constructed according to institutional, communication, legal and value criteria. Directions for further humanization of public administration in Ukraine are formulated.

Keywords: public administration, social concept, state policy, social state, civil society, social development, economic security, social security, inclusiveness, consumer prices, educational sphere.

References

  1. Denhardt, R.В., & Denhardt, J.V. (2000). The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. URL: https://www.csus.edu/indiv/s/shulockn/executive%20fellows%20pdf%20readings/par-denhardt%20new%20public%20service.pdf. (Accessed: 02 November 2025).
  2. Ingraham, P.W., and David H. R. (1989). The New Public Personnel and the New Public Service. Public Administration Review. 49(2): 116–25.
  3. Kaboolian, L. (1998). The New Public Management. Public Administration Review 58(3): 189–93.
  4. Kaufman, H. (1956). Emerging Conflicts in the Doctrines of Public Administration. American Political Science Review 50(4): 1057–73.
  5. McCabe, B., and Janet, V. (1999). Governance Lessons: The Case of Charter Schools. Administration and Soci- ety 31(3): 361–77.
  6. Pomaza-Ponomarenko A. (2017). Social development and security of regions: state and administrative aspects: monograph. Kharkiv: Publishing house "Disa Plus". 270 p.
  7. Schubert, G. (1957). “The Public Interest” in Administrative Decision-Making: Theorem, Theosophy, or Theory. The American Political Science Review 51(2): 346–68.
  8. Stivers, C. (1994). The Listening Bureaucrat. Public Administration Review 54(4): 364–9.
  9. Terry, L.D. (1998). Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the Public Management Movement. Public Administra- tion Review 58(3): 194–200.
  10. 10. Tracker of the economy of Ukraine during the war. Center for Economic Strategy. 24.10.2025. URL: https://ces.org.ua/tracker-economy-during-the-war/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22439086746&gbraid=0AAAAACM-mc1Y3ctKqSnS-4LwazufUGLmP&gclid=Cj0KCQjwgpzIBhCOARIsABZm7vGZ_OKjQEUVBD0z24YdMCi-deeq-CTMaVZ-BFQqvFysXg8HR6RnANYaArL1EALw_wcB (Accessed: 02 November 2025).