Astakhov V. 

associate of Training-Production-Research Center, National University of Civil Defense of Ukraine, Kharkiv

COMPARISON OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION IN THE FIELD OF STRUGGLE WITH CORRUPTION IN UKRAINE AND SINGAPORE

DOI: 10.52363/passa-2023.1-10

Abstract

In the article, based on the analysis of the international index «Transparency International» for 2022 (CPI), a comparison of public management and administration policies in the field of anti-corruption of Ukraine and Singapore from the moment of their independence to the present day is carried out. The activities of the main, universal anti-corruption bodies with a special status of these countries, which implement the policy of combating corruption and other criminal offenses, their laws on the prevention of corruption, which these bodies are guided by to fulfill their duties, are analyzed.
A comparison of the socially oriented anti-corruption legislation of the studied countries and the basic laws of the above-mentioned countries was made. The powers of managers and employees of such bodies were analyzed. A comparison of the criminal and other laws of these countries regarding the application of preventive measures and punishments in case of detection of corruption crimes was carried out.
Particular attention is focused on the dependence of the country's economic development, its level of perception of corruption, and it is established that a more developed country, which is able to adequately pay for the work of officials, is able to control them.
It has been established that the normative policies of the above-mentioned countries are approximately at the same level, so the fight against corruption is primarily based on economic factors.

Key words: corruption, CPI index, Ukraine, Singapore, Law, anti-corruption

References

1. CORRUPTION PERCEPTION INDEX – 2022 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2022/index/sgp;
2. Shmal. The Singapore model of anti-corruption: experience for Ukraine / L.M. Shmal // Scientific journal of the National Academy of Prosecutor's Office
   of Ukraine. – 2015. – No. 2. – P. 110–118 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.chasopysnapu.gp.gov.ua/chasopys/ua/pdf/6- 2015/shmal.pdf;
3. Nonik Singapore's anti-corruption history: experience for Ukraine [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/ ?op=1&z=1509;
4. Prevention of Corruption Act [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: www.cpib.gov.sg;
5. Corruption, Drug Trafficking аnd Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation
   of Benefits) Act [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: https://www.cpib.gov.sg;
6. The Criminal Code of 1871 (Singapore Penal Code. – Chapter IX. OFFENSES BY OR RELATING TO PUBLIC SERVANTS) [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://sso.agc.gov.sg/act/pc1871;
7. Law «On the Parliament» of Singapore (Parliament (Privileges, Immunities and Powers) [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: www.cpib.gov.sg;
8. Political Donations Act [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: www.cpib.gov.sg;
9. The Customs Act of Singapore [Customs Act [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: www.cpib.gov.sg;
10. National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_anti-corruption_bureau_of_Ukraine;
11. Law of Ukraine dated 14.10.2014 No. 1698-VII «On the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine»;
12. Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses dated 07.12.1984 No.8073-X;
13. Criminal Code of Ukraine dated April 5, 2001 No. 2341-III;
14. Law of Ukraine dated May 14, 2013 No. 224-VII «On Amendments
    to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding Liability for Corruption Offenses»;
15. Law of Ukraine dated September 16, 2014 No. 1682-VII «On Purification of Power»;
16. Official portal of the National Agency for Prevention of Corruption [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://nazk.gov.ua/uk/.