Orlov V.
Candidate of Science in Public Administration, Associate Professor, First Vice-Rector, State University of Economics and Technology, Kryvyi Rih.
ORСID: 0000-0002-6505-470X
Koval G.
Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor, Professor of the Department of Public Management and Administration of the Educational and Scientific Law Institute, State University of Economics and Technology, Kryvyi Rih.
ORСID: 0000-0001-5317-6876
Postupna O.
Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor, Professor of the Department of Public Management and Administration of the Educational and Scientific Law Institute, State University of Economics and Technology, Kryvyi Rih.
ORСID: 0000-0002-0622-0966
DOI: 10.52363/passa-2026.1-13
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to conceptualize the meaning of the category “public recovery management” and to justify a structural-functional model of multilevel governance based on the synergy between government bodies, civil society institutions, and the business sector in the context of modern security challenges. The research methodology is based on the application of a systems approach, structural-functional analysis and network modeling methods. Comparative analysis was used to identify barriers to participation and case studies to illustrate successful spatial planning practices in Kyiv, Mykolaiv and Chernihiv regions. Results. The need for a transition from hierarchical management to a “state together with citizens” model is proven, where the public sector acts as an active subject with its own expertise. A functional matrix of interaction levels (planning, monitoring, implementation) has been developed, and a model of multilevel governance has been created. Particular attention is paid to the digitalization of processes through the DREAM ecosystem as a tool for ensuring transparency and accountability. Key barriers are identified - low institutional capacity of communities, formalism and a crisis of trust. Conclusions. The success of territorial recovery depends on the depth of implementation of the principles of collaborative governance in everyday practice. Building a sustainable public administration system requires strengthening the educational component for civil servants, scaling up digital platforms, and enacting legislation to establish mandatory public consultation procedures. The proposed approaches make it possible to transform social energy into concrete results of sustainable regional development.
Keywords: public administration, public power, regional administration, regional development, sustainable development, civil society, social capital, social responsibility, communications, public diplomacy, recovery, institutionalization of cooperation, paradigm of interaction, participation, public-private partnership.
Published: 26.06.2026
References
- Bakumenko, V.D. (2015). Publichne administruvannia yak protses vyroblennia, pryiniattia ta vykonannia upravlinskykh rishen [Public administration as a process of developing, adopting and implementing management decisions]. Naukovi rozvidky z derzhavnoho ta munitsypalnoho upravlinnia, 1, 8-26. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nrzd_2015_1_3 [in Ukrainian].
- Bakumenko, V.D., & Krasnokutskyi, O.O. (2019). Formuvannia systemy bazovykh znan u haluzi publichnoho upravlinnia ta administruvannia [Formation of a system of basic knowledge in the field of public management and administration]. Ukrainskyi zhurnal prykladnoi ekonomiky, 4(3), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2019-3-23 [in Ukrainian].
- Vasylenko, N.V. (2025). Publichne upravlinnia v umovakh pisliavoiennoho vidnovlennia v Ukraini [Public administration in the context of post-war reconstruction in Ukraine]. Naukovi innovatsii ta peredovi tekhnolohii,1(41), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-5274-2025-1(41)-28-35 [in Ukrainian].
- Honcharuk, N., & Cherednychenko, A. (2022). Modernizatsiia publichnoho upravlinnia v Ukraini v umovakh viiny ta v postvoiennyi period u konteksti yevropeiskykh tsinnostei [Modernization of public administration in Ukraine during the war and in the post-war period in the context of European values]. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia, 10(6), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.15421/152243 [in Ukrainian].
- Danylyshyn, B. (2024). Osnova upravlinskoi vzaiemodii dlia prostorovoho rozvytku terytorialnykh hromad u konteksti povoiennoho vidnovlennia Ukrainy [The basis of managerial interaction for the spatial development of territorial communities in the context of post-war reconstruction of Ukraine]. MODELING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 4, 290-295. https://doi.org/10.31891/mdes/2024-14-38 [in Ukrainian].
- Deiaki pytannia diialnosti ahentsii rehionalnoho rozvytku [Some issues of the activities of regional development agencies] : Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 21.10.2022 r. № 1203. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1203-2022-%D0%BF#Text [in Ukrainian].
- Yizha, M.M., & Kurnosenko, L.V. (2023). Publichne upravlinnia v umovakh vyklykiv voiennoho stanu [Public administration in the face of martial law challenges]. Publichne upravlinnia ta rehionalnyi rozvytok, 19, 11-30. https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2023.19.01 [in Ukrainian].
- Kozyr, S.V. (2025). Detsentralizatsiia ta rehionalna polityka vidnovlennia Ukrainy v umovakh voiennoho stanu: problemy i rekomendatsii [Decentralization and regional policy of Ukraine's restoration under martial law: problems and recommendations]. Empirio, 2(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.18523/3041-1718.2025.2.1.15-26 [in Ukrainian].
- Koordynatsiia protsesu vidbudovy ta vidnovlennia z politykoiu rehionalnoho rozvytku v Ukraini [Coordination of the reconstruction and recovery process with regional development policy in Ukraine]. Analitychnyi dokument, pidhotovlenyi Prohramoiu «U-LEAD z Yevropoiu» [pereklad. V. Sosnovska]. Kyiv, 2023 r. 53 s. Retrieved from https://decentralization.ua/uploads/attachment/document/1293/%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%96%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0.pdf [in Ukrainian].
- Obolenskyi, O., Kosytska, V., & Ohorodnyk, V. (2024). Rozvytok publichno-pryvatnoho partnerstva pry formuvanni stratehii mistsevoho rozvytku v umovakh povoiennoi vidbudovy [Development of public-private partnership in the formation of local development strategies in the conditions of post-war reconstruction]. Collection of Scientific Papers "Scientific Notes", 35(2), 130-142. http://doi.org/10.33111/vz_kneu.35.24.02.11.075.081 [in Ukrainian].
- Orlov, V.V., & Postupna, O.V. (2026). Instrumenty tsyfrovoi transformatsii v publichnomu upravlinni: proiektnyi menedzhment do publichnoi dyplomatii ta vzaiemodii z hromadianskym suspilstvom [Digital transformation tools in public administration: project management to public diplomacy and interaction with civil society]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, 7, 413-421. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814 [in Ukrainian].
- Pro zatverdzhennia Prohramy kompleksnoho vidnovlennia terytorii Kyivskoi oblasti na 2023-2027 roky [On approval of the Program for the Comprehensive Restoration of the Territory of Kyiv Region for 2023-2027] : rishennia Kyivskoi oblasnoi rady vosmoho sklykannia vid 17.10.2023 r. № 726-21-VІІІ. Retrieved from https://kor.gov.ua/rishennia/zatverdzhennia-prohramy-kompleksnoho-vidnovlennia-terytorii-kyivskoi-oblasti/ [in Ukrainian].
- Prohrama kompleksnoho vidnovlennia Chernihivskoi oblasti [Comprehensive Recovery Program of Chernihiv Region] : rishennia dvadtsiat tretoi sesii oblasnoi rady vosmoho sklykannia vid 25.04.2025 r. № 2-23/VІІІ. Чернігів, 2025. 178 с. Retrieved from https://cg.gov.ua/web_docs/1/2015/10/docs/96.pdf [in Ukrainian].
- Yanchuk, A.O. (2024). Ekonomichna stratehiia povoiennoho vidnovlennia yak osnova zabezpechennia natsionalnykh interesiv [Economic strategy of post-war recovery as the basis for ensuring national interests]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: yurydychni nauky, 35((74)5), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.32782/TNU-2707-0581/2024.5/14 [in Ukrainian].
- Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. 194 р. [in English].

