Galushko S. TYPOLOGY OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR SOCIO-POLITICAL AND STATE-LEGAL EFFECTS ON THE SPHERE OF NATIONAL SECURITY

Galushko S.
postgraduate student of the Educational, Research and Production Сenter, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine, Kharkiv

TYPOLOGY OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR SOCIO-POLITICAL AND STATE-LEGAL EFFECTS ON THE SPHERE OF NATIONAL SECURITY

DOI: 10.52363/passa-2024.1-2

Abstract

The typology of digital technologies is systematized on the basis of the analyzed scientific developments in this field. The role of such technologies in ensuring the development of the public administration system is defined. It is emphasized that the influence of digital technologies on the sphere of national security must be predicted and regulated in view of the scale of the danger that lies in the use of such technologies. The role of artificial intelligence in the provision of national security is substantiated.

Key words: public administration, sphere of national security, digitalization, digitalization technologies, digital transformation, authorities.

References

  1. Pocheptsov G. Toxic infospace. How to maintain clarity of thinking and freedom of action. Kharkiv: Vivat, 2022. 384 p.
  2. Pomaza-Ponomarenko A.L., Taraduda D.V. Foreign experience of ensuring social security through the sustainable functioning of critical infrastructure objects and increased danger // Science and technology today. 2024. No. 4 (32). P. 371-384.
  3. Pomaza-Ponomarenko A.L., Taraduda D.V. Mechanisms for ensuring civil security of Ukraine: aspects of emergency prevention at the facilities of the military-industrial complex // Public administration and national security. 2024. No. 3 (44). https://www.inter-nauka.com/issues/administration2024/3/9732.
  4. Arterton F. C. Political Participation and «Teledemocracy» // PS: Political Science Politics. 1988. Vol. 21, №. 3. P. 620–627.
  5. BBVA Research analyzes 99 countries by digitalization index (https://www.bbva.com/en/which-countries-are-the-most-digitally-advanced/); Bloomberg’s primary research service (BNEF) analyzes the industrial digitalization of 40 countries (https://about.bnef.com/blog/bloombergnefs-country-ranking-reveals-models-industrial-digitalization/); as part of the Digital Economy project, almost all UN member countries are analyzed
  6. Beniger J. The Control Revolution. Harvard University Press, 1986. 508 p.
  7. Benkler Y. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press, 2006. 528 p. 
  8. Bimber B., Flanagin A., Stohl C. Collective Action in Organizations: Inter- action and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change. Cambridge University Press, 2012. 240 p.
  9. Brown D. Electronic government and public administration // International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2005. Vol. 71, Issue 2. P. 241–254. 
  10. Carrizales T. Critical Factors in an Electronic Democracy: a Study of Municipal Managers // Electronic Journal of E-Government. 2008. Vol. 6, Isue 1. P. 23–30.
  11. Castells. The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication net- works, and global governance // The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2008. Vol. 616, Issue. 1. P. 78–93.
  12. Chen P. Australian Politics in a Digital Age. Australia, New Zealand School of Government: ANU Press, 2013. 268 p.
  13. Dreshpak V.M., Kovalov V.G., Babachenko N.V., Pavlenko E.M. (2020) Communicative policy of public authorities in european countries: comparative analysis,  International Journal of Management, Vol. 11, Iss. 06, pp. 529-543.
  14. Flew T. New Media: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2005. 280 р.
  15. Framework for the identification and demand-orientated classification of digital technologies / A. Lipsmeier [et al.] // IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD). 2018. P. 186–194.
  16. Engin Z., Treleaven P. Algorithmic Government: Automating Public Services and Supporting Civil Servants in using Data Science Technologies // The Computer Journal. 2019. Vol. 62, Issue 3. P. 448–460.
  17. European Commission. Thematic Paper “Creating Digital Strategies”. August 2018  For instance, The German Federal Government has issued a set of national strategies that outlines a roadmap for digital transformation.  https://germandigitaltechnologies.de/national-strategies/.
  18. European Parliament Research Service. Ten technologies which could change our lives: Political impacts and policy implementations. 2015. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/EPRS_IDAN_527417_ten_trends_to_change_your_life.pdf.
  19. Janowski T. Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization // Government Information Quarterly. 2015. Vol. 32, Issue. 3. P. 221–236. 
  20. Jensen K. B. Definitive and Sensitizing Conceptualizations of Mediatizaion // Communication Theory. 2013. Vol. 23, Issue 3. P. 203– 222.
  21. Jho W., Song K. J. Institutional and technological determinants of civil e-Participation: Solo or duet? // Government Information Quarterly. 2015. Vol. 32, Issue. 4. P. 488–495.
  22. Information Economy Report: Digitalization, Trade and Development, (United Conference on Trade and  Development, 2017),  https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ier2017_en.pdf.
  23. Karpf D. The MoveOn effect: The unexpected transformation of American political advocacy. Oxford University Press, 2012. 256 p.
  24. Loebbeke C. Digitalisierung – Technologien und Unternehmensstrategien. Handbuch Medienmanagement. Springer Verlag, 2006. 360 p.
  25. Manoharan A., Carrizales T. J. Technological equity: An international perspective of e-government and societal divides // Electronic Government. 2011. Vol. 50, Issue 1. P. 56–66. 
  26. Mergel, Edelmann, Haug. Defining digital transformation:  36, Issue 4. P. 101385.
  27. Norris P. Virtual democracy // Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 1998. Vol. 3, no. 2. P. 1–4.
  28. Pomaza-Ponomarenko A., Hren M., Durman O., Bondarchuk N., Vorobets V. Management mechanisms in the context of digitalization of all spheres of society // Revista San Gregorio. SPECIAL EDITION-2020. Núm. 42. URL: http://revista.sangregorio.edu.ec/index.php/REVISTASANGREGORIO/issue/view/RSAN42/showToc.
  29. Pomaza-Ponomarenko A., Kryvova S., Hordieiev A., Hanzyuk A., Halunko O. Innovative Risk Management: Identification, Assessment and Management of Risks in the Context of Innovative Project Management // Economic Affairs (New Delhi). 2023, 68(4), pp. 2263–2275. DOI: 10.46852/0424-2513.4.2023.34. URL: https://ndpublisher.in/admin/issues/EAv68n5z8.pdf.
  30. Pomaza-Ponomarenko A., Taraduda D., Leonenko N., Poroka S., Sukhachov M. Ensuring the safety of citizens in times of war: aspects of the organization of civil defense // AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. 2024. Volume 14. Issue 1. Pp. 216–220. URL: https://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/140139/papers/K_10.pdf.
  31. Pool I. S. Technologies of Freedom. Harvard University Press, 1984. 299 p.
  32. Rose J., Flak L. S., Saebo O. Stakeholder theory for the E-government context: Framing a value-oriented normative core // Government Information Quarterly. 2018. Vol. 35, Issue 3. P. 362–374. 
  33. Sassen S. Globalization and its discontents: Essays on the new mobility of people and money. New Press, 1998. 288 p.
  34. Schuh G., Klappert G. Technologiemanagement – Handbuch Produktion und Managemen. Springer Verlag, 2011. Р. 17-34. 
  35. Storsul T. adn Fagerjord A. Digitization and Media Convergence // International Encyclopedia of Communication. 2008. P. 1319–1323.
  36. Syvak, T., Vorona, P., Nesteriak, Y., Paliukh, V., Dakal, А. Current State of Strategic Communications in Ukraine and Their Functional Influence on Efficiency of State Management System // Contributions to Political Science. 2023. art F1367, pp. 167–182.
  37. United Nations. Digital Economy Report 2019. URL: https://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=2466.
  38. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. UN E-Government Surveys (2001-2018). URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/en/Research/UN-e-Government-Surveys.
  39. Wachal R. Humanities and Computers // The North American Review (New). 1971. P. 30–32.
  40. Watson R.T., Mundy B.A strategic perspective of electronic democracy // Communications of the ACM. 2001. Vol. 44, Issue 1. P. 27–30.
  41. Van Dijk J. The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2005. 272 p.